web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
 


 

JCIO Logo

STATEMENT

 

JCIO 68/25

Date: 19 January 2026

 

STATEMENT FROM THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE

Mr Sarfraz Uddin JP

 

A spokesperson for the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said:

The Lord Chancellor, with the Lady Chief Justice’s agreement, has removed Mr Sarfraz Uddin of the Central London Local Justice Area from office for failure, without a reasonable excuse, to meet the minimum sittings required of a magistrate.

Facts

On appointment, magistrates sign a declaration and undertaking which includes a commitment to sit for at least 13 days (or 26 half days) a year. If they fail to do so without an acceptable reason, they are expected to resign. They are also expected to keep in regular contact with their bench chair.

The summary process in the Judicial Conduct (Magistrates) Rules 2023 enables a regional conduct advisory committee secretary to recommend a magistrate’s removal from office without further investigation where that magistrate has failed, without a reasonable excuse, to meet their minimum sittings requirement.

London Conduct Advisory Committee recommendation

The London Conduct Advisory Committee (LCAC) recommended Mr Uddin’s removal from office, citing his failure to meet the annual minimum sittings requirement for three consecutive years from April 2022. The LCAC noted that Mr Uddin had previously been contacted about his sittings but had still failed to meet the minimum requirement.

Mr Uddin’s representations

Mr Uddin did not respond to the LCAC’s request for comments.

Decision

The Lord Chancellor and the Lady Chief Justice agreed with the recommendation to remove Mr Uddin from office.
 
 

ENDS

Notes for Editors

Media queries in relation to the JCIO should be made in the first instance to the Judicial Press Office - telephone 020 7073 4852 or via email - press.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk 

Sanctions for misconduct by judicial office-holders are set out in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. They are, in order of severity: formal advice, formal warning, reprimand and removal from office.

For more information about the Office, including details on how to make a complaint against a judicial office holder, you can visit the JCIO website at: Judicial Conduct Investigations website